Isaac v. Oregon
Notice Images Notice Text Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding pro se, respectfully submits this voluntary notice regarding Defendants' Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed March 12, 2026. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff does not file this notice as a required pleading under Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), which imposes no
Shelly Boshart Davis
Defendants, except the unnamed Doe Defendants, by and through the undersigned, in response to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, admit, deny, and allege as follows: 1. Senator Manning has been dismissed as a defendant in this action by Court Order, ECF No. 14 (Jan. 22, 2026) (“Order”). Therefore, Defendants deny
Isaac v. Oregon
Order Images Order Text Plaintiff, a self-represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. To effectuate service of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 13), the Clerk of
Isaac v. Oregon
Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding in forma pauperis, brought this action against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. The Court screened Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, 2d Am. Compl., ECF No. 13 ("SAC"), pursuant to 28 U.S.
Shelly Boshart Davis
Motion Images Motion Text Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac respectfully renews his request for appointment of pro bono counsel. Since this Court's September 2, 2025 Order denying Plaintiff's initial request, material circumstances have substantially changed that now warrant appointment under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)
Shelly Boshart Davis
Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP"), brought this action against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. The Court screened Plaintiff's Complaint and First Amended Complaint, Am. Compl., ECF No. 9
Isaac v. Oregon
SAC Images SAC Text COMES NOW Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac, appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, and submits this Second Amended Complaint pursuant to the Court's November 26, 2025 Opinion and Order (ECF No. 12), which granted leave to amend identified deficiencies. I. INTRODUCTION This is a
James Manning
Opinion and Order Images Opinion and Order Text MCSHANE, Judge: Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, proceeding in forma pauperis ("IFP"), brought this action against Oregon legislators and legislative staff who allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. Compl., ECF No. 1. Following screening of his Complaint under
Isaac v. Oregon
FAC Images FAC Text INTRODUCTION 1. This is a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) to redress violations of Plaintiff's rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 2. Plaintiff Logan Martin Isaac is a disabled Iraq
James Manning
Opinion and Order Images Opinion and Order Text MCSHANE, Judge: Self-represented Plaintiff, Logan Martin Isaac, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this action against Oregon legislators and law enforcement agencies that allegedly deprived him of his constitutional rights. Before the Court, in addition to Plaintiff’s
Isaac v. Oregon
On July 3, 2025 I filed a federal civil rights lawsuit, Case No. 6:25-cv-01159-MC, against James Manning, Shelly Boshart Davis, Renee Perry, Rebecca “Becky” Maile, the Oregon State Police, and the Oregon Department of Justice for violations of the KKK Act of 1871, 42 USC §§ 1983
Shelly Boshart Davis
A primer for anyone wanting to know more about the Oregon Civil Rights Showdown for GIJustice. Transcript It is Wednesday April 30th at 8:45 in the morning and I'm going to try and give as concise an account of these civil rights cases as possible there'